not seen that before. Do you have an example URL? (replace dots with spaces when posting URLs)

yes that is odd. It may be related to the fact that your images are very large. Try making them smaller.

So, after a little more testing, even after resizing the image down... cutting the file size etc etc.... they are STILL cut off....

Any other ideas??

Thanx,

I've had the same problem.

Mike,

The problem has ONE fix that I could find... And that is to shrink the photos to have pixel dimensions of LESS than 1000 in either direction.

If there is another way to fix this I would appreciate knowing about it... as it is, I have to shrink the size of the photos which is causing a loss in quality.

Is there a way that you know of to have them at FULL quality?

Thanx,

Mike,

My images come out in the range of 3xxx by 5xxx px
Im not certain why the viewer would have issues with the larger number of pixels as the "size" of the viewable screen does not change.

i will put together some images that are giving me a hard time and send them to you, and I wish you best of luck, cause I cant figure it out.   :D

The only problem I have is how to shrink them without losing the quality.... I know that most viewers cant see the whole picture at once when they are that size, but if I do too much dropping and shrinking... then it loses a lot of quality....

Any suggestions?

You should be able to shrink the images without any significant loss of quality. You will have to apply sharpening (un-sharp mask) to any image reduced in size. Use photoshop or similar. I would not recommend putting such large images on the web for several reasons: it will slow down the image viewer, it will be too big for any screen so the software has to reduce it in size anyway, people can steal large files and print them. All the images n my web site are either 400x600 (port) or 900x600 (land).
You should also consider contrast and color adjustments and embedding a color profile.

It doesn't matter what size your original image size is, if it doesn't fit in the browser window then the browser or simpleviewer will re-size it anyway.
In my experience there is little or no discernable difference between viewing the full size (as it was taken) image on a computer monitor to viewing a smaller version. In fact it is probably better to format the image to the exact (or as close as possible) size that it will be viewed, which for most people's screens would be about 1000 pixels or smaller, and setting the contrast and color saturation and sharpness using the sRGB color profile at the reduced size. You can then control how the smaller image will display and you can set it so that it as closely as possible resembles the original image. And remember it will look completely different on every different screen and in different browsers, some with color management and some without.
I don't think you will ever really achieve an "as taken" representation.

www mjamesphoto info

I have corrected ONE photo (not that it will likely be obvious which one it was)

Now that I have a little bit of free time I may get around to working on the whole thing