Hello Steven,
It all worked perfect! - thank you very much!
The 'test gallery' seems ready: http://gallery.myworld.net.pl/
Just two more technical questions...
1. The flash gallery overlaps with the drop down flash menu and the drop down lists hide behind the gallery, which makes them useles... I had the same problem with flash map application on my website http://www.myworld.net.pl but they suggested I add so.addParam('wmode', 'opaque'); to the embedding code and it worked. I am not sure (as I have little-to-no idea about flash codes...) how it can work with the galleries... Would the parameter mode be the same or different? Where in the embedding code do I need to put it and does it need to be preceded/followed by anything? Now the code is as follows;
<!--START SIMPLEVIEWER EMBED.-->
<script type="text/javascript" src="../incl/svcore/js/simpleviewer.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
var flashvars={};
flashvars.baseURL="../incl/";
flashvars.languageCode = "EN";
simpleviewer.ready(function () {
simpleviewer.load('sv-container', '100%', '100%', '000000', true, flashvars);
});
</script>
<div id="sv-container"></div>
<!-- END SIMPLEVIEWER EMBED -->
2. Resize images (tick/untick) - I have images set to 800px x 800px and thumbnails to 70px x 70px. When I have 'resize images' ticked, I can see that thumbs are good quality (otherwise they are blurred). If the original images for the gallery are max 800px, does this mean they will not be affected whatsoever by the application resizing images? Even if images scale to adjust to the space available for the gallery? I am asking as my vertical images are showing slightly smaller than 800px due to space limit on the website that I have set, and I do not want them to lose on quality in comparison to the originals...
Many thanks for all your help!